﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><channel><title>BlogJava-走自己的路-随笔分类-Test</title><link>http://www.blogjava.net/ldd600/category/32144.html</link><description>路漫漫其修远兮，吾将上下而求索</description><language>zh-cn</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:14:48 GMT</lastBuildDate><pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:14:48 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title>提高遗留代码的测试覆盖率</title><link>http://www.blogjava.net/ldd600/archive/2010/03/10/315073.html</link><dc:creator>叱咤红人</dc:creator><author>叱咤红人</author><pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 09:23:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.blogjava.net/ldd600/archive/2010/03/10/315073.html</guid><wfw:comment>http://www.blogjava.net/ldd600/comments/315073.html</wfw:comment><comments>http://www.blogjava.net/ldd600/archive/2010/03/10/315073.html#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.blogjava.net/ldd600/comments/commentRss/315073.html</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://www.blogjava.net/ldd600/services/trackbacks/315073.html</trackback:ping><description><![CDATA[&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 摘要: A项目一开始code的时候，没有加任何test。现在需要重构了，我们根据use case设计了一些automation的high level 的接近integration test的functional tests. 但跑下来发现code coverage不高。于是老大让我看看想些方法提高一下code coverage。总结一下。&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href='http://www.blogjava.net/ldd600/archive/2010/03/10/315073.html'>阅读全文</a><img src ="http://www.blogjava.net/ldd600/aggbug/315073.html" width = "1" height = "1" /><br><br><div align=right><a style="text-decoration:none;" href="http://www.blogjava.net/ldd600/" target="_blank">叱咤红人</a> 2010-03-10 17:23 <a href="http://www.blogjava.net/ldd600/archive/2010/03/10/315073.html#Feedback" target="_blank" style="text-decoration:none;">发表评论</a></div>]]></description></item><item><title>Unit test学习总结</title><link>http://www.blogjava.net/ldd600/archive/2009/09/04/293894.html</link><dc:creator>叱咤红人</dc:creator><author>叱咤红人</author><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 08:01:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.blogjava.net/ldd600/archive/2009/09/04/293894.html</guid><wfw:comment>http://www.blogjava.net/ldd600/comments/293894.html</wfw:comment><comments>http://www.blogjava.net/ldd600/archive/2009/09/04/293894.html#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.blogjava.net/ldd600/comments/commentRss/293894.html</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://www.blogjava.net/ldd600/services/trackbacks/293894.html</trackback:ping><description><![CDATA[&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 摘要: 最近又把压在箱底的几本单元测试相关的书翻了翻，既然翻了，顺便拿了个笔头记了记，好记性不如烂笔头呀。内容不算太多，平时写Unit test时要follow，要深入理解，不然就不能学以致用。以后相关的内容，就往这个坑里填了。&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href='http://www.blogjava.net/ldd600/archive/2009/09/04/293894.html'>阅读全文</a><img src ="http://www.blogjava.net/ldd600/aggbug/293894.html" width = "1" height = "1" /><br><br><div align=right><a style="text-decoration:none;" href="http://www.blogjava.net/ldd600/" target="_blank">叱咤红人</a> 2009-09-04 16:01 <a href="http://www.blogjava.net/ldd600/archive/2009/09/04/293894.html#Feedback" target="_blank" style="text-decoration:none;">发表评论</a></div>]]></description></item><item><title>对比XStream和JSON</title><link>http://www.blogjava.net/ldd600/archive/2009/01/20/252089.html</link><dc:creator>叱咤红人</dc:creator><author>叱咤红人</author><pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 09:43:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.blogjava.net/ldd600/archive/2009/01/20/252089.html</guid><wfw:comment>http://www.blogjava.net/ldd600/comments/252089.html</wfw:comment><comments>http://www.blogjava.net/ldd600/archive/2009/01/20/252089.html#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>5</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.blogjava.net/ldd600/comments/commentRss/252089.html</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://www.blogjava.net/ldd600/services/trackbacks/252089.html</trackback:ping><description><![CDATA[&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 摘要: 对json(json lib,  jettison)和xstream转换后的数据长度，格式和花费的时间做了比较，描述了使用json和xstream的各自的优势，以及如何如何选择。&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href='http://www.blogjava.net/ldd600/archive/2009/01/20/252089.html'>阅读全文</a><img src ="http://www.blogjava.net/ldd600/aggbug/252089.html" width = "1" height = "1" /><br><br><div align=right><a style="text-decoration:none;" href="http://www.blogjava.net/ldd600/" target="_blank">叱咤红人</a> 2009-01-20 17:43 <a href="http://www.blogjava.net/ldd600/archive/2009/01/20/252089.html#Feedback" target="_blank" style="text-decoration:none;">发表评论</a></div>]]></description></item><item><title>Toplink多种会话缓存同步方案的性能比较</title><link>http://www.blogjava.net/ldd600/archive/2008/06/13/207664.html</link><dc:creator>叱咤红人</dc:creator><author>叱咤红人</author><pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 06:46:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.blogjava.net/ldd600/archive/2008/06/13/207664.html</guid><wfw:comment>http://www.blogjava.net/ldd600/comments/207664.html</wfw:comment><comments>http://www.blogjava.net/ldd600/archive/2008/06/13/207664.html#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.blogjava.net/ldd600/comments/commentRss/207664.html</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://www.blogjava.net/ldd600/services/trackbacks/207664.html</trackback:ping><description><![CDATA[&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 摘要: 上次用Coherence实现缓存数据同步的transport manager之后，对它进行了压力测试并和EMS JMS和 OracleAS JMS（内存）进行了性能对比。文中描述了测试的过程，并共享了代码和测试结果。&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href='http://www.blogjava.net/ldd600/archive/2008/06/13/207664.html'>阅读全文</a><img src ="http://www.blogjava.net/ldd600/aggbug/207664.html" width = "1" height = "1" /><br><br><div align=right><a style="text-decoration:none;" href="http://www.blogjava.net/ldd600/" target="_blank">叱咤红人</a> 2008-06-13 14:46 <a href="http://www.blogjava.net/ldd600/archive/2008/06/13/207664.html#Feedback" target="_blank" style="text-decoration:none;">发表评论</a></div>]]></description></item></channel></rss>