﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><channel><title>BlogJava-Enhance.Technology.Area-最新评论</title><link>http://www.blogjava.net/soulengineer/CommentsRSS.aspx</link><description>技术前沿阵地</description><language>zh-cn</language><pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2007 22:56:45 GMT</pubDate><lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2007 22:56:45 GMT</lastBuildDate><generator>cnblogs</generator><item><title>re: Maven - 专家级工具1[未登录]</title><link>http://www.blogjava.net/soulengineer/archive/2007/04/28/114332.html#114351</link><dc:creator>Jerry</dc:creator><author>Jerry</author><pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2007 07:35:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.blogjava.net/soulengineer/archive/2007/04/28/114332.html#114351</guid><description><![CDATA[楼主写的不错，ant和maven并非 “既生瑜，何生亮”，而是各有千秋，两个工具的定位不同，以此想到现在不少软件公司的所谓的架构师在使用工具的时候根本就不去深入的思考工具，而是随大流，流行什么就用什么，这两个项目都很成功，是有她存在的道理的，希望楼主再接再励，继续就两个工具做深入的剖析，比如ant是如何在项目中表现她的灵活性的，期待中，嘿嘿!!!<img src ="http://www.blogjava.net/soulengineer/aggbug/114351.html" width = "1" height = "1" /><br><br><div align=right><a style="text-decoration:none;" href="http://www.blogjava.net/soulengineer/" target="_blank">Jerry</a> 2007-04-28 15:35 <a href="http://www.blogjava.net/soulengineer/archive/2007/04/28/114332.html#114351#Feedback" target="_blank" style="text-decoration:none;">发表评论</a></div>]]></description></item></channel></rss>